Re:Tell HN: YouTube is banning accounts that support Ukraine
by HWR_14 on Friday February 25, 2022 @12:58PM
(#30470074)
> Youtube's value isn't as a profit center, but a way of keeping people inside Google's ad ecosystem.
Even more important from Google's point of view is it was the way to push Chrome to dominance. And a way to keep it there ahead of any potential competitors.
Which is valuable because of the data and ability to block ad blockers. That is, Google's ad ecosystem.
Re:Tell HN: YouTube is banning accounts that support Ukraine
by alecbz on Friday February 25, 2022 @01:04PM
(#30470169)
> it was the way to push Chrome to dominance.
How did YT push Chrome?
Re:Tell HN: YouTube is banning accounts that support Ukraine
by HWR_14 on Friday February 25, 2022 @01:12PM
(#30470264)
In 2009/2010 YouTube advertised Chrome as a better way to view YouTube videos pretty extensively. YouTube also is a moving target that other browsers have to hit (see also GoogleDocs.)
It's similar to how "DOS ain't done until Lotus won't run", only with YouTube and other browsers.
Re:Tell HN: YouTube is banning accounts that support Ukraine
by anamax on Saturday February 26, 2022 @11:41AM
(#30479106)
Microsoft abandoned their "not Chrome-based" Edge code base, despite the fact that it was significantly faster than Chrome on almost every other site, because of the way that YouTube does some layers. This "way" has no functional effect, but it does block certain optimizations, optimizations that Edge was using and Chrome still isn't.
Google optimizes YT for Chromium-based renderers. Or rather, Google pessimizes YT for other renderers.
If the profitability of Youtube is on the table, then so should be antitrust, and Google should not be allowed to own it.