The article proposes to replace the current file system approach (which works just fine for me, by the way, thank you very much) with something different to solve a problem that I (just like the post you reply to) have no interest in.

Better search? Sure! Improved speed of storage and retrieval? Great! But either show that it is not degrading current functionality or be ready for pushback from people suspicious that their current setups will break. My 2c.