News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:No minimum parking requirements? No problem for Fayettevi... by bluGill on Wednesday February 23, 2022 @04:13PM (#30446528)
Sidewalks went out of style in the 1960s, and a trend that started reversing around 2000. Developers have learned that people like sidewalks and do use them so they are building them again to attract people to build on their lots.

That said, the purpose of said sidewalks is to exercise your dog, or let your kids ride their bikes around. They often don't connect up to anything in a useful way (other than nearby parks and maybe elementary schools - but only if they are very close)

Re:No minimum parking requirements? No problem for Fayettevi... by johannes1234321 on Wednesday February 23, 2022 @04:34PM (#30446795)
> They often don't connect up to anything in a useful way (other than nearby parks and maybe elementary schools - but only if they are very close)

What should it connect to? Thanks to zoning there is no Café you can go to or a small supermarket or anything else in the vicinity. Not even public transport which then might bring you elsewhere.

Re:No minimum parking requirements? No problem for Fayettevi... by yardie on Wednesday February 23, 2022 @04:59PM (#30447137)
Sidewalks went out of fashion because developers thought they took away property sq footage. So a 5000sqft SFH lot became 4800 sqft. But then homeowners realized if kids don’t have sidewalks they’ll play in the streets.

If they could get away with it developers would drop sidewalks completely. It’s only because cities and towns started mandating it that they became fashionable again.

Re:No minimum parking requirements? No problem for Fayettevi... by Sharlin on Wednesday February 23, 2022 @06:47PM (#30448333)
Wait, do you mean that building sidewalks is the developer's responsibility? Do you mean like greenfield development on wholly privately owned land? Around here it's the municipality's job to plan and build (with subcontractors of course) transport infrastructure in new developments, just like power/water/etc infrastructure.
Re:No minimum parking requirements? No problem for Fayettevi... by wolverine876 on Wednesday February 23, 2022 @06:55PM (#30448425)
In many places afaik, sidewalks are the responsibility of the property owner.
Re:No minimum parking requirements? No problem for Fayettevi... by olyjohn on Wednesday February 23, 2022 @07:40PM (#30448842)
In a lot of places, that means you only have to build a sidewalk when you're doing some kind of construction on the property. In some Seattle neighborhoods (mostly suburbs), you'll have neighborhoods with 20 houses in a row, and only the 5 or 6 newest houses will have a short sidewalk that is only the length of the property. So you're bouncing back and forth between sidewalks and ditches. Sidewalks just start, end and go nowhere.
Re:No minimum parking requirements? No problem for Fayettevi... by Sharlin on Thursday February 24, 2022 @04:19AM (#30452611)
That’s crazy.
Re:No minimum parking requirements? No problem for Fayettevi... by bluGill on Wednesday February 23, 2022 @09:12PM (#30449470)
The developes are planning and building roads too.
Re:No minimum parking requirements? No problem for Fayettevi... by Sharlin on Thursday February 24, 2022 @04:58AM (#30452919)
An alien concept but sort of explains some things.
Re:No minimum parking requirements? No problem for Fayettevi... by throwaway0a5e on Thursday February 24, 2022 @08:19AM (#30454288)
>But then homeowners realized if kids don’t have sidewalks they’ll play in the streets.

Which was considered fine at the time and depending on where you live is still fine.

Re:No minimum parking requirements? No problem for Fayettevi... by bluGill on Thursday February 24, 2022 @09:14AM (#30454904)
In most suburban streets it would still be fine. Though parents are more paranoid than in 1960. However suburbs need buys roads all over (many are stroads, but the fact of car living means you need busy roads to get around)