I don't think I need to watch any videos from that channel in order to have the opinion "videos from anonymous YouTube channels are unlikely to be high quality news sources."

Even if I did watch their videos, what would that tell me? In what context should I judge them? Do they cite sources other than their anonymous presenter's own knowledge? Do I have sufficient knowledge to evaluate the sources they give me, if they give me any?

You haven't really answered my question: What has this entity done to earn your trust?

You're embarrassing yourself. It's a presentation of OSINT data.

I would suggest having an informed opinion over a loud one.

Since we're doing personal attacks now, I'm gonna disengage, but "a presentation of OSINT data" is meaningless if the data involved can't be independently vetted or cited.

This is my last comment responding to you; for the record, you have still answered none of my questions.

They literally have links to everything being presented.... that's what makes it Open Source. You're more than welcome to verify all the facts independently, as many already are. That level of transparency is not possible with CNN.