And they fail in other categories too, e.g. C can be very terse whereas most modern so-called replacements tend towards verbose. For me that's a development exactly in the wrong direction; I'd rather have a more terse C.
Zig? I personally haven't used it, but based on what I've heard about it, it fulfills these criteria.
Sure, other languages have caught up or have improved on some of the features where C shines.
Let's remove portability and integration from the feature list, because that's strongly related to C's tenure.
Which one of the languages you listed matches the rest of the feature set I brought up?
In my opinion, they all fail in at least one category, and that's expected - additional functionality can't come for free. You can only accept its cost.