News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Resolving the gravitational redshift across a millimetre-... by jcims on Friday February 18, 2022 @12:13PM (#30388348)
>Our result is enabled by improving the fractional frequency measurement uncertainty by more than a factor of 10, now reaching 7.6 × 10−21.

This is mindboggling. That timeframe is to one second roughly as a millisecond is to the estimated age of the universe.

Re:Resolving the gravitational redshift across a millimetre-... by phendrenad2 on Friday February 18, 2022 @12:42PM (#30388692)
Theoretically, could you use an 3D grid of these devices to continuously sample the gravitational potential they're experiencing, and build a dead-reckoning navigational system?
Re:Resolving the gravitational redshift across a millimetre-... by pdonis on Friday February 18, 2022 @01:03PM (#30388989)
For measurements as accurate as this, if you sent out a fleet of these things to map the gravitational potential of the Earth by location, for example, you would find that the potential at a given location was changing all the time, so such a map wouldn't be useful for navigation.
Re:Resolving the gravitational redshift across a millimetre-... by jcims on Friday February 18, 2022 @01:31PM (#30389325)
It would also make stealth-proof gravitational radar equivalent. You would probably have to work on the acronym though.
Re:Resolving the gravitational redshift across a millimetre-... by cma on Friday February 18, 2022 @12:25PM (#30388487)
> This is a preview of subscription content

Is there a readable version if this somewhere? Was it govt funded?

Re:Resolving the gravitational redshift across a millimetre-... by jmilum on Friday February 18, 2022 @12:39PM (#30388649)
Re:Resolving the gravitational redshift across a millimetre-... by cma on Friday February 18, 2022 @12:55PM (#30388890)
Thanks!