News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Scientist busts myths about how humans burn calories by verytrivial on Friday February 18, 2022 @03:55AM (#30383526)
In the context of nutrition the word calories always means dietary calories, so the kilo- prefix is redundant unless discussing physics, or commenting on HN...Ooooh, ok.
Re:Scientist busts myths about how humans burn calories by hnbad on Friday February 18, 2022 @04:10AM (#30383635)
The practice of indicating kcals as "Calories" always seemed to be an American thing to me. I don't know how widespread this is outside the US but there are plenty of countries that use "kcal" in nutritional tables and such. People will still colloquially confuse calories and kilocalories a lot but that's largely due to bad translations (similar to mistranslating short billions).
Re:Scientist busts myths about how humans burn calories by ajuc on Friday February 18, 2022 @04:15AM (#30383675)
In Poland you write "100 kcal" but say "100 kalorii" unless it's in scientific context.
Re:Scientist busts myths about how humans burn calories by saiya-jin on Friday February 18, 2022 @05:11AM (#30384024)
People everywhere mix those 2 regularly and nobody is confused. You don't say you go out for a run to burn some kilo calories and so on. Sometimes places like HN are needlessly pedantic
Re:Scientist busts myths about how humans burn calories by tremon on Friday February 18, 2022 @09:45AM (#30386319)
If someone explicitly writes "160 000" calories I'm going to assume they meant 160 kcal.