News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Finality does not exist in payments by lxgr on Tuesday February 15, 2022 @02:48PM (#30351669)
> Nothing was "unwound." The government found the criminals' private key, which they were unwisely storing in an online account. That allowed the government to make a new transaction, moving the funds wherever they liked.

This is how "unwinding" works in almost all payment systems: Creating a second transaction to (partially or fully) offset the effects of the original one.

Re:Finality does not exist in payments by tshaddox on Tuesday February 15, 2022 @03:16PM (#30352037)
Yes, this is how normal everyday commerce works. My employer transfers some USD into my bank account. I then transfer some of those USD to my landlord's bank account. This is in no sense a reversal of an earlier transaction or an indication that an earlier transaction was "not finalized."
Re:Finality does not exist in payments by DennisP on Tuesday February 15, 2022 @02:53PM (#30351746)
Fine, but the government has no special power over Bitcoin in this regard. If they hadn't found the key, they wouldn't have been able to issue that transaction, and any common thief who found the key could have done what they did.
Re:Finality does not exist in payments by lxgr on Tuesday February 15, 2022 @02:57PM (#30351803)
The relevant meta-point here is that the government is uniquely positioned to come into possession of most keys that it wants (or more indirectly, render them useless by including them on sanction/embargo lists).