News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A database of broken things to identify common failure mo... by hubraumhugo on Monday February 14, 2022 @03:50PM (#30338109)
I'll definitely add such a feature soon. Even if things don’t break - waiting a minimum of 6+ months or 50—100 minimum uses really makes a review relevant. Recurring reviews could be a good way to track the whole lifecycle of a product.

After every year, the reviewer will receive an automatic reminder like "hey there, did anything break or deteriorate?"

Letting the user set the frequency of reminders could make sense since it will vary between product categories. In addition, if the user has nothing to add, a simple click on a button "Condition unchanged" should be enough.

There are no comments on this comment yet.