So glad you did it for your second! Siblings can be a 75% match, so that's awesome. Love the term YOLO-type analysis haha
But it's getting pretty clear that the only innovation here is to target lower income families than your competitors, by using platforms like tiktok and charging a low upfront fee (but higher monthly fee).
No need, I believe you. It's just that it seemed others here pay less than that.
But it's a bit confusing that you only pay for the first 8 years. That makes it look more expensive than it is. Why not lower the monthly fee to $20 but keep it for the full 20 years?
Why would a young not so well off family prefer to pay 35 dollars a month for eight years, to paying say 20 for 20 years?
I'm really confused by this because it seems that it would benefit both your customers, and you, since you could charge more overall while imposing a smaller burden. Plus it would sound cheaper.
2173 followers (personal account): https://www.tiktok.com/@kathrynjc7
699 followers: https://www.tiktok.com/@anjahealth
10 followers: https://www.tiktok.com/@anja_health
How is Anja Health different from other established US providers such as Cord Blood Registry, Via-Cord, or Cryo-Cell?
Also, if our family already has a sample frozen at one of these other facilities, and assuming there's a compelling reason to switch, do you have a tissue sample transfer mechanism/protocol?
>>If you didn’t, what prevented you from doing so?
Didn't for our first child because we weren't aware (education/awareness issue), but we did it for the second child. It feels like a tail risk hedge, and literally YOLO-type analysis is what motivates us to continue paying for the sample to stay frozen.