Computer scientists prove why bigger neural networks do better

Re:Computer scientists prove why bigger neural networks do b... by mattkrause on Thursday February 10, 2022 @07:59PM (#30295349)

Yes! I got interested in this when my colleague worked with a person who had an entire hemisphere resected as a teenage.

FWIW, the nail thing is a bit of a neuroscience meme. I heard--and stole--this quip from multiple people in several different situations. There's also a really striking figure in that chapter (p. 7 or 8).

No argument that the rats' behaviors are affected. I suppose whether you find the slowness of their grooming expected (because of brain damage) or impressive (because it happens at all) is a matter of taste. Glass^W Skull half-empty or half-full, if you will.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Computer scientists prove why bigger neural networks do b... by heavenlyblue on Thursday February 10, 2022 @08:15PM (#30295488)

> No argument that the rats' behaviors are affected. I suppose whether you find the slowness of their grooming expected

They are not slow, they just stop grooming themselves well enough.

[ Parent | on HN ]