Re ipsa loquitur, may suffice.
I mean, look at landmines, the original autonomous killing weapon.
There is no ambiguity who is responsible.
If a team of 10 coders worked on a robot that went on a murdering spree, does every coder go to jail?
Personally? Yes. They brought the thing about. If they did not do their due diligence to endure that outcome eouldn't happen, responsibility, when traced out lay with them.
If you were hoping to trip me up on "how many layers of seperstion until it's not your fault", you got the wrong guy. Unfortunately, I endure maintaining some of the most banal systems imaginable specifically because if I can reasonably forsee an outcome I'm not comfortable being culpable for, I don't work on it.
...You'll slso be surprised how muchoral quandry there is in many systems we take for granted.
It's s curse.
Re:Did HAL Commit Murder?
by hydrogtehd on Wednesday February 09, 2022 @09:33PM
(#30281775)
There’s always criminal negligence.
But I wish governments could just ban AI
This would be difficult as a matter of law, and possibly unjust as a matter of morality, given that autonomous weapons are inherently unpredictable.
The distance separating the soldier from the independent decisions made by autonomous weapons in rapidly evolving environments may be simply too great.