Re:Artist uses AI to fake 70s science fiction pulp covers – ...
by webmaven on Tuesday February 08, 2022 @03:51PM
(#30264515)
> There is also the choices made by the art directors at the publishers to consider; they were aware of current trends in SF/F book covers, as well as other genres, and would select artists based on how well they worked with those trends. Or against them. Consider for instance Richard Powers (http://www.richardmpowers.com/1970s) who did a ton of psychedelic SF cover work in the 60s, and less work in the 70s as things swung to a more realistic look.
Powers' work definitely evokes that particular era, but (to me at least) it seems a bit... dour, I suppose, and a poor fit for lighter hearted works from then (Laumer's Retief, Harrison's Stainless Steel Rat novels). Definitely a case where ADs were conforming to a trend, although the later examples in those series aren't as jarring.
There is also the choices made by the art directors at the publishers to consider; they were aware of current trends in SF/F book covers, as well as other genres, and would select artists based on how well they worked with those trends. Or against them. Consider for instance Richard Powers (http://www.richardmpowers.com/1970s) who did a ton of psychedelic SF cover work in the 60s, and less work in the 70s as things swung to a more realistic look.
The history of printing and art materials also plays into this. Full color printing was cheap enough for full color covers to be normal; compare 1970s SF covers to SF covers from the 1920s or 1930s, when color separations had to be done by hand, and when acrylic paints were not yet available!