How are these remotely similar? The Chinese comic is symbolizing the actual war crimes of actual Australian soldiers against actual Afghan children. For which no one was held accountable IIRC.

Olympic athletes are not committing war crimes or violence as suggested by the agitprop posters.

You'd have to have a childlike naivete about figurative-cartoon communication to believe those cartoons "suggest" athletes, in their sportwear, are committing atrocities in Olympic-event-like tableaus.

Perhaps living under a censorious regime creates such gullibility, & obliviousness to metaphor & sarcasm?

(Separately: prosecutions of the Australian soldiers involved in the incidents Mr. Zhao "symbolized" are still possible – but as far as I can tell, none of the incidents involved the slitting of children's throats, as in his graphic photorealistic rendering.)

> Perhaps living under a censorious regime creates such gullibility, & obliviousness to metaphor & sarcasm?

Such is life here in America...

> For which no one was held accountable IIRC.

If you're used to a system in which the courts assume the prosecutor is always right and so the judge's only task is to decide the sentence, then a trial with rules of evidence, burden of proof, etc., will seem very slow.

Not sure if that is a troll or not.

CCP policy and behaviour towards Xinjiang shows a clear intent to eradicate Uighur culture, possibly the Uighur people, on the part of the CCP state. Simlilarly for Hong Kong, Tibet. A warcrime by an Australian soldier is being dealt with as a matter of military discipline.

There is no equivalency between the two. Pretending that a crime is equivalent to state genocide is classic "wolf warrior" trolling.

A better equivalency would be between what's happening with the Uighurs and what happened to Australia's first nation people in the nineteenth century. Modern China does have more than a little in common with those old European colonial empires.

Uyghurs are the top ethnicity in Xinjiang and their population is increasing faster than any other, so I have no clue what you are going on about.

For a long period it was against the law for an Irishman to own a horse worth more than 5 pounds. Englishmen could assault an Irishman with a horse worth 50 pounds, steal it, and throw a 5 pound note at the owner's feet, and the (English) magistrate would say that no offence had been committed. A young Catholic Irishman who converted to the Protestant branch of Christianity would get title to his Catholic father's house and could evict his family or charge them rent. There were also more systemic laws limiting Irish peoples' access to education and careers.

But the Irish remained the top ethnicity in Ireland and their population increased fast for most of that period, so I have no clue what the IRA were going on about.

The GP was comparing the Uyghurs to targets of European ethnic cleansing, not colonization.

Do you have a reliable source to support that assertion?

Can we go there and freely discuss the situation with residents, without minders nearby?

Can they freely practice their relgion? Can they leave? Can they choose not to have regime loyalists stay in their homes? (https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2018/11/30/uninvited-guests-k...)

Yes

I think if that were true you'd have supplied reliable sources documenting it.

Escapees report differently, & fear retaliation against their remaining family: https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2021/04/uy...

Melissa Chan is a Gordon Chang-level troll. Not a journalist.

Wire me $1000 and I'll produce video testimony of an Asian-looking person alleging literally any atrocity you want by China/Russia/Iran.

Unverifiable testimony not made under oath and grainy Google Earth screenshots are simply not reliable evidence in the current year.

As for actual evidence, PRC publishes their census data online for everyone to see. If you don't believe that, you can look up "Ürümqi street" on YouTube and get a ballpark figure for how many Turkic people and cultures are represented there. If you still think there is Holocaust 2.0 going on in Xinjiang, you are ideologically poisoned beyond reason.

Why do you have ad hominem rather than sources?

Why is your first thought creating hoaxes for pay rather than collecting honest testimony?

Why is your go-to source “PRC census data” rather than any evidence of actual freedoms to live without minders, travel, speak, practice religion?