Re:The EARN IT act is back, and it’s more dangerous than ever
by nate_meurer on Sunday February 06, 2022 @04:10PM
(#30237029)
This is the kind of comment that I fucking hate the most. You've attacked OP with a stupid, bad-faith presumption that has nothing to do with their simple and straightforward statement.
In case I have to spell it out for you, yes, OP can simultaneously disagree with Feinstein and with multiple other politicians.
Re:The EARN IT act is back, and it’s more dangerous than ever
by colinmhayes on Sunday February 06, 2022 @05:34PM
(#30237729)
> OP can simultaneously disagree with Feinstein and with multiple other politicians.
That's not what they said. They said Feinstein was worse.
Re:The EARN IT act is back, and it’s more dangerous than ever
by tagoregrtst on Sunday February 06, 2022 @07:00PM
(#30238433)
Worse doesn't mean that everyone else is swell.
A < B and A < 0 doesn’t imply B>0. All it implies is that A<B
Re:The EARN IT act is back, and it’s more dangerous than ever
by nate_meurer on Sunday February 06, 2022 @08:49PM
(#30239170)
I see. So in your world, when I say that Trump was the worst president in history, that means that I "don't mind" Bush or Nixon?
Help me understand your logic here.
Re:The EARN IT act is back, and it’s more dangerous than ever
by tagoregrtst on Sunday February 06, 2022 @02:59PM
(#30236370)
It follows from basic math that, if I dislike Feinstein the most, I dislike the other 99 senators less.
However, it doesn't follow from:
“Feinstein is the senator I dislike the most”
That I don’t mind the other 99, or any subset thereof.
You don't mind the senators that voted to disenfranchise the millions of voters in Arizona?