Re:The EARN IT act is back, and it’s more dangerous than ever
by umanwizard on Sunday February 06, 2022 @02:01AM
(#30230134)
Just FYI the zero-padded date thing is incredibly distracting and weird. (Yes I know there’s some “foundation” pushing this, but still).
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The EARN IT act is back, and it’s more dangerous than ever
by missingrib on Sunday February 06, 2022 @02:09PM
(#30235821)
What foundation?
Re:The EARN IT act is back, and it’s more dangerous than ever
by umanwizard on Sunday February 06, 2022 @05:13PM
(#30237555)
The Long Now Foundation
Re:The EARN IT act is back, and it’s more dangerous than ever
by kragen on Sunday February 06, 2022 @07:30AM
(#30231935)
You say that as if it's a bad thing.
Re:The EARN IT act is back, and it’s more dangerous than ever
by nate_meurer on Sunday February 06, 2022 @03:09PM
(#30236476)
To be consistent, you should pad the other numbers you use too. Like money amounts. And I think you should pad dates out to eight digits, just to be safe.
Re:The EARN IT act is back, and it’s more dangerous than ever
by kragen on Sunday February 06, 2022 @05:50PM
(#30237865)
I think I'll also pad out your name, Nate______.
Re:The EARN IT act is back, and it’s more dangerous than ever
by nate_meurer on Sunday February 06, 2022 @08:50PM
(#30239176)
Ok that's funny. Thank you for not padding me with zeros.
Re:The EARN IT act is back, and it’s more dangerous than ever
by kragen on Monday February 07, 2022 @01:35AM
(#30241135)
That would be inhumane.
Re:The EARN IT act is back, and it’s more dangerous than ever
by umanwizard on Sunday February 06, 2022 @12:55PM
(#30234980)
It makes your post come off as an ad for this foundation that 99.9% of people don’t care about and that has nothing to do with the topic being discussed; it’s as if I inserted [DRINK MORE COCA-COLA] into random parts of my comment.
Yes, distracting from your main point by intentionally attracting attention to something completely unrelated is bad.
Re:The EARN IT act is back, and it’s more dangerous than ever
by kragen on Sunday February 06, 2022 @05:46PM
(#30237837)
People who are looking for an excuse to give others grief for harmlessly violating social conventions probably should not be posting on a site named "Hacker News"—after all, hackers have always been weird, think of Turing. In any case they are not capable of engaging with my substantive points, should I have any, so I'm not losing anything by discomforting them.
And it's good to know who those griefers are before that becomes a life-or-death question, as it eventually was for Turing, Swartz, Assange, and so many others.