News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Go performance from version 1.2 to 1.18. Parent comment

Re:Go performance from version 1.2 to 1.18 by manigandham on Friday February 04, 2022 @04:07AM (#30204481)
Your article shows that Java, Scala, and .NET are all faster than significantly faster than Go in latency and throughput, and can beat C++ as well.

This only affirms our point that JIT can keep up with, or beat, AOT already.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Go performance from version 1.2 to 1.18 by blub on Friday February 04, 2022 @05:23AM (#30204997)
It can, after a warm-up period and by using 10x the memory and likely non-idiomatic code. Sometimes one can live with that, sometimes not.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Go performance from version 1.2 to 1.18 by kaba0 on Friday February 04, 2022 @04:39PM (#30213663)
Look at benchmark game’s java programs - it is very idiomatic compared to most other contenders yet it is exceedingly fast
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Go performance from version 1.2 to 1.18 by pjmlp on Friday February 04, 2022 @06:17AM (#30205403)
Only when the users are clueless to configure JIT caches.

As for non idiomatic code, that is even worse for Go code, as it lacks many of the performance tuning knobs.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Go performance from version 1.2 to 1.18 by fnord123 on Friday February 04, 2022 @05:26AM (#30205016)
I literally said this in my comment.
[ Parent | on HN ]