News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Silenced AirTags with disabled speakers are popping up for sale online. Parent comment

Re:Silenced AirTags with disabled speakers are popping up fo... by dylan604 on Thursday February 03, 2022 @04:25PM (#30199129)
The question as asked seems pretty clear to me. If Company A builds a product/service, why should Company B be expected to utilize Company A's work without compensation?

What more information do you need?

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Silenced AirTags with disabled speakers are popping up fo... by ohyeshedid on Thursday February 03, 2022 @07:18PM (#30200994)
The questions, as asked, are lacking in tangible reality dynamics and are phrased with bias.

My first response to the first version of that loaded question: "_I wasn't saying they should_..."

You respond with: "If Company A builds a product/service, why should Company B be expected to utilize Company A's work without compensation?"

Am I to believe you're being genuine here? Should I really repeat myself again, in text, to save you a scroll up?

I didn't say that. I never implied that. I stated the exact opposite.

Why are you asking me to rationalize and explain a stance I've never taken, and don't have?

[ Parent | on HN ]
[dead]
Re:Silenced AirTags with disabled speakers are popping up fo... by ohyeshedid on Thursday February 03, 2022 @11:20PM (#30202831)
>...why should...

Sure, right after you show me where I mentioned a second company, and that they should be able to access Apple's network without compensation.

Hell, I'll accept you showing where I mentioned a first company by name.

You can do better than low effort trolling.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Silenced AirTags with disabled speakers are popping up fo... by imwillofficial on Friday February 04, 2022 @05:44PM (#30214476)
I reread your posts.

I’ll be charitable, what is your point exactly?

[ Parent | on HN ]