News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Settings are not a design failure. Parent comment

Re:Settings are not a design failure by GoblinSlayer on Thursday February 03, 2022 @02:14AM (#30189623)
>if people don't like the path laid out for them, they're either wrong or they can go use something else

This is a reasonable limitation. If you implement infinite features, you end up with a bloatware, so some features can't be implemented, and users should use something else.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Settings are not a design failure by numpad0 on Thursday February 03, 2022 @02:22AM (#30189679)
It’s not about features, parent comment is arguing about adjustments. Sure you don’t need 65535 choice of colors for a chair; but you do need the height to be adjustable(ideally within -327.68 to +327.68 mm).
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Settings are not a design failure by GoblinSlayer on Thursday February 03, 2022 @03:11AM (#30189954)
But should it have wheels?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Settings are not a design failure by jcelerier on Thursday February 03, 2022 @04:28AM (#30190476)
No you're right, a wheeled chair would not be really useful, would it
[ Parent | on HN ]