Sure it does. Quite a few European countries have a top tax bracket in the 50% range. Denmark's capital gains rate is 42%, more than double what Bezos pays here.
Short-term capital gains in the US are also taxed according to income tax rates, so 37% for the top bracket, which isn't far off 42%.
Sure... and yet, Bezos hasn't moved his assets somewhere with zero capital gains tax, like Switzerland. There are clearly benefits to being in the US that are worth the 20% tax rate to him. I think a lot of them would still be present if it were 30-40%.
Guess who typically does this? The very wealthy. Guess who doesn't do it? Less wealthy people.
Many of these tax laws that are enacted end up affecting people who are upper middle class and don't affect the mega rich at all.
> No one is going around breaking windows to give window makers jobs.
Not literally no. But metaphorically it does happen all the time:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parable_of_the_broken_window#O...
The point I was generally making is that more complicated tax laws normally don't tax the people that they purport to target and normally end up affecting those that are a couple of rungs down in the class hierarchy that everyone pretends that doesn't exist in most Western Societies.
For example. This was a few years ago. I saw a headline where I think I paid (relatively) a greater proportion of tax from my small Limited Company than one of American coffee franchises paid in the UK. Due to them doing some tax wangling with Ireland. If I were to do the same, I would have HMRC investigating me and I wouldn't be able to afford such an investigation. They probably have a dedicated tax compliance team. I don't.
And yet it doesn't happen
> And glass-makers are happy when it hails, but that doesn't mean we should be going around breaking windows.
No one is going around breaking windows to give window makers jobs