Re:America’s Covid job-saving programme gave most of its cas...
by drunkpotato on Wednesday February 02, 2022 @08:43AM
(#30177361)
It seems like you have a problem and a solution both staring right at you.
Re:America’s Covid job-saving programme gave most of its cas...
by throwaway6734 on Wednesday February 02, 2022 @07:32AM
(#30176632)
Pay more with that pot of gold you're sitting on?
Re:America’s Covid job-saving programme gave most of its cas...
by technothrasher on Wednesday February 02, 2022 @08:44AM
(#30177371)
We are absolutely paying our people more, just gave everybody raises. But can’t get new people even when we offer more.
Re:America’s Covid job-saving programme gave most of its cas...
by bradlys on Wednesday February 02, 2022 @02:09PM
(#30182385)
Probably still underpaying then, aren’t you?
And giving everyone raises after a record year of inflation isn’t exactly a headline statement. It’s more like - “our workers would have made less this year than last year if we hadn’t given them raises… and probably would’ve quit. So, we had to give them raises.”
Re:America’s Covid job-saving programme gave most of its cas...
by kar5pt on Thursday February 03, 2022 @10:29PM
(#30202487)
"I went to the market and offered $2 for a loaf of bread - the shopkeeper said no. So I offered $3, but he still said no. This must mean that no amount of money could possibly buy a loaf of bread and not that the price of bread has risen above what I offered."
While we were affected by a reduction in orders at beginning of the pandemic , we would have survived without layoffs anyway. But we decided to take the money and hold on to it in case the situation got worse. Now we’re sitting on a pot of gold that is supposed to help our workers from losing their jobs, but our current biggest labor issue is short staffing.