Re:Cruise is opening driverless cars to the public in San Fr...
by jhbadger on Wednesday February 02, 2022 @04:38AM
(#30175523)
But I think the point is that she wasn't convicted of endangering people's lives, which many would consider a far greater crime than just a con defrauding some gullible marks. People depended on those tests. They made choices (such as whether or not to have surgeries) based on the results.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Cruise is opening driverless cars to the public in San Fr...
by toss1 on Wednesday February 02, 2022 @08:26AM
(#30177164)
I agree with your point, and I definitely wonder what was the failure in prosecution that produced those not-guilty verdicts. Not only was people's health involved with the fraudulent testing service, but the healthcare consumers did not in any way sign up for that.
The specific comment that I was responding to seemed to say it should be okay to defraud Accredited Investors should be "able to live with that".