Re:The McNamara fallacy: Measurement is not understanding
by apohn on Tuesday February 01, 2022 @08:33PM
(#30172344)
I had guessed something like this was going on, but reading this just really makes me wonder what's really going on in the minds of a private equity folks. The C-suite and senior leadership were the ones who drove the company to the point that they ended up in the hands of private equity, but they were incentivized to stay.
I get that they exiting leadership knows the company and it's hard to find new people. But it just seems so crazy to me.
We had teams that had 50%+ percent of people gone between layoffs and attrition. It was comical to see how much stuff fell between the newly formed cracks. I still can't comprehend how much they must have been incentivized to stay when the earth was crumbling around them.
I get that they exiting leadership knows the company and it's hard to find new people. But it just seems so crazy to me.
We had teams that had 50%+ percent of people gone between layoffs and attrition. It was comical to see how much stuff fell between the newly formed cracks. I still can't comprehend how much they must have been incentivized to stay when the earth was crumbling around them.