News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on GDPR penalty for passing on of IP address to Google by using Google Fonts. Parent comment

Re:GDPR penalty for passing on of IP address to Google by us... by bruce343434 on Sunday January 30, 2022 @06:01AM (#30135830)
You just need to have a bit of common sense about what's good for your users and what's not good for them.

That copyright example by the way, that applies everywhere.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:GDPR penalty for passing on of IP address to Google by us... by drstewart on Sunday January 30, 2022 @07:38AM (#30136635)
My common sense would say embedding a link to Google Fonts to make use of caching is possible is good for the user
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:GDPR penalty for passing on of IP address to Google by us... by bruce343434 on Sunday January 30, 2022 @08:00AM (#30136796)
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30136221

> The browsers don't share third-party caches across domains, because it made it easier to leak information about which sites the user has visited.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:GDPR penalty for passing on of IP address to Google by us... by neoromantique on Sunday January 30, 2022 @08:03AM (#30136823)
And because of people like you we are stuck with NoScript and the like
[ Parent | on HN ]