News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Tor Browser: a legacy of advancing private browsing innov... by southerntofu on Saturday January 29, 2022 @06:13AM (#30125485)
This was always accounted for in Tor's threat model. That's why you take many different circuits depending on what location you're trying to reach.

That's also why for the highest security needs VPN+Tor is a recommendation. Although to be fair i personally believe if an actor is powerful enough to perform traffic analysis across the Tor network, they're probably powerful enough to correlate your computer activity with the VPN<->tor link.

Networks that resist metadata analysis are called mixnets and there's some interesting research about them. The downsides are you add latency (because each hop needs to randomize sleep) so bidirectional sessions like TCP is unthinkable. So nothing as usable as Tor Browser for checking your webmail or reading a blog.

Re:Tor Browser: a legacy of advancing private browsing innov... by summm on Saturday January 29, 2022 @06:51AM (#30125622)
Or, instead of TCP, content-based storage as in Freenet.
Re:Tor Browser: a legacy of advancing private browsing innov... by southerntofu on Saturday January 29, 2022 @06:55AM (#30125634)
Yes P2P CAS (torrent/freenet/ipfs) sounds very interesting over mixnets. Do you have links to specific implementations?
Re:Tor Browser: a legacy of advancing private browsing innov... by summm on Saturday January 29, 2022 @09:35AM (#30126567)
Freenet manages to implement some kind of anonymity without mixnets, relying on inserting/retrieving storage blocks sacrificing latency. In my opinion that's the better approach, because if you separate storage and communication, like ipfs-over-tor, you'll never get anything with proper anonymity and decent performance.

Beyond that, I've heard of xolotl related to gnunet, but I am not sure to what extent it is actually implemented and/or working, as usual with gnunet.

Re:Tor Browser: a legacy of advancing private browsing innov... by southerntofu on Saturday February 05, 2022 @06:39AM (#30220158)
Are you aware of modern Freenet reimplementations, by any chance?
Re:Tor Browser: a legacy of advancing private browsing innov... by goodpoint on Saturday January 29, 2022 @09:42AM (#30126623)
content-based storage is not "instead" of TCP. It's a different solution for a different requirement.
Re:Tor Browser: a legacy of advancing private browsing innov... by southerntofu on Sunday January 30, 2022 @07:46AM (#30136692)
correct, content-addressed storage is often implemented on top of TCP. I wrongly used TCP to generically mean "location-addressed".