Guidance on Software Development and Open Source Software [pdf]

Re:Guidance on Software Development and Open Source Software... by froh on Thursday January 27, 2022 @01:15PM (#30103989)

SLES and rhel don't simply add patches from mainline. For Ubuntu I hope it's the same.

And even in the community distros you have maintainers.

All professionally managed packages, kernel, libc, gcc/llvm postgres, python, etc etc have full time professional mainline maintainers.

And package maintainers with a high working ethos as reviewers and gatekeepers.

The problem is with leaf packages in ginornous self serviced blindly trusting huge repos like pip or cargo or younameit, npm, with huge numbers of tiny packages with no tangible responsibility whatsoever.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Guidance on Software Development and Open Source Software... by kragen on Thursday January 27, 2022 @08:33PM (#30109654)

Hmm, are you saying Red Hat has someone who reviews every line of code Google adds to Chromium and every line of code Apple adds to LLVM? And who will refuse patches they aren't confident in? That's not impossible but it definitely isn't my understanding of how Red Hat works.

[ Parent | on HN ]