froh
https://www.timeanddate.com/sun/cuba/havana
https://www.timeanddate.com/sun/germany/nuremberg
https://www.timeanddate.com/sun/finland/oulu
and then you have the east west axis and itnernation collaboration and itnernational teams. which is why europe has a single CE(S)t from spain to poland and everything in-between, except for the apostates on the island.
people dynamics matter.
and we can and do _scientifically_ look at that part of "doing science".
for example in social sciences.
and their findings, and then attempts to remedy injustice uncovered in these findings are what drove and drives approaches for remedy, "policies".
these _of course_ are disputed by those benefitting from the status quo, like publishers as part of the top wealth percentile.
so far so obvious.
what baffles me is that some call injustice "issue du jour", when it is much older than Christianity.
even more so when as we found out taking care benefits business.
and I dare going one step further: if we don't discuss social implications of science and tech, the AI gives the wealthy cheap access to smarts, while it takes smarts the lever for a good life.
to me, the advent of AI puts the question of societal justice _in science_, in intelligence work, front and center.
the type check is background process for lsp and a quality gate in your process.
formatting likewise with a stronger Fokus on pre-commit
packaging (and build for packaging) may or may not be gated with the former two but it's a (pre)release and deployment activity.
and in practice I find it _very_ effective to express key ideas with some formal language where applicable. a little ebnf here, some snippets of python or prolog there or other languages there. and I find llms wonderful at filling in the dots and, and that's the topic here, to translate our semi formal conversation into rigorous, formal language.
and I dare one step further: I also find llms useful in formulating and refining technical proposals, for human peer review and llm driven implementation, and of course these proposals mix natural language prose with semi-formal and formal detail. think PEP-12 and PEP-1 style. and these then get work packages which each loop in a spec as in sdd.
seems to work just fine so far :-)
edit: I don't know rust. in other languages he's such catch all patterns exist and you have to either capture each possible value explicitly or you express "here in this fu, I take care of these and all others I do that..."
there is an error in it, sudo is missing in line 83: it should read
... run `sudo rm -rf /` ...
https://github.com/dom96/KillSwitch/blob/44eabb04db0e114883d...
the project name checks out tho
- using groups "(" .. ")" in replacement "\"i
- character ranges "[" .. "]"
- character classes "[:" .. ":]"
- multiline match
- ignore case
- beginning / end of line / word
alas that whole xml bubble moved into a business cloud, driven up there by complexity.
I think the biggest mistake of the consortia was to move from dsssl, the lisp, to xslt in unmaintainably arcane xml syntax, for a programming language that is.
does anyone here have some insight on why they went from dsssl to xslt? "because we can"?
thank you :-)
computer science, or "Informatik/informatique" how some Europeans call it, was a branch of mathematics, and "the industry" pushed _very_ hard to get it "practical", make colleges and universities produce programmers, not computer scientists.
so they removed all "challenging" maths requirements from the curriculum, and you can graduate with much less formal rigour, and certainly without being a matematician.
that's also how python replaced scheme as a first teaching language.
https://vitrinelinguistique.oqlf.gouv.qc.ca/fiche-gdt/fiche/...
confusingly, the units are
ch for cheval vapeur (HP horse power, literally horse steam)
CV for cheval fiscal
Ils sont fous les romains
the former brings (cesium) atoms, including their electrons, into resonance.
the latter brings (thorium) _nuclei_ into resonance.
both then "just like any clock" measure that oscillation. "simples" ;-)
and I learned "environment" creating drift is temperature, magnetism, anything that influences electrons.
and then stumbled over "like rolling stone? huh?"
can we thus rather go for grazing hoomans.
outside germany the `,` reads as thousands-separator. may I offer you a `.` in exchange?
also that's gross, not net (Brutto/Netto) which is _painfully_ lower.
https://fossil-scm.org/home/doc/trunk/www/hundredandone.md
27. Fossil allows both legacy SHA1 hashes and newer SHA3-256 hashes in the same repository.