News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Naomi Wu video demonetized on YouTube by prawn on Thursday January 27, 2022 @07:36AM (#30099776)
An alternate perspective is that she dresses how she wishes, and other people ascribe that sex appeal regardless. The most outrageously attired of a group of similarly skilled people is likely to draw the most fans and detractors, whether that was their intention or not.
Re:Naomi Wu video demonetized on YouTube by elsjaako on Thursday January 27, 2022 @08:17AM (#30100160)
I'm guessing it's a bit of both, and I don't think there's anything wrong with that.

I'm a white male, so it's relatively easy to convince people to take me seriously. That isn't a great situation, but noone expects me to downplay that to make things more fair.

She has a harder time being taken seriously (as evidenced by the MAKE story), but she's attractive which makes her videos more interesting. I don't think you can blame her for using advantages.

From what I've seen of her, she does seem to enjoy being dressed nicely, so I don't think she's only doing it to get views.

Re:Naomi Wu video demonetized on YouTube by ashwagary on Thursday January 27, 2022 @07:56PM (#30109380)
I tend to hold the opinion that a person who doesnt look like "they belong" is among the most likely to have actually earned the right to be there.
Re:Naomi Wu video demonetized on YouTube by raxxorrax on Thursday January 27, 2022 @07:52AM (#30099921)
Of course appeal is subjective, but I believe she calls herself sexy cyborg. Denying intent is almost as offensive as a denial of existence I believe. Although there can be cases like that.
Re:Naomi Wu video demonetized on YouTube by SexyCyborg on Thursday January 27, 2022 @08:04AM (#30100023)
Because if there's anything to judge a person on the basis of, it's Reddit logins they chose when they were 20 and stuck with as they grew in popularity
Re:Naomi Wu video demonetized on YouTube by Anthony-G on Thursday January 27, 2022 @11:16AM (#30102324)
I don’t know why Naomi’s comment is being downvoted. Another young (at that time) woman, Amanda Knox learned the hard way about being judged on the basis of her online account name: When the tabloid media learned that her Myspace nickname was “Foxy Knoxy”, they spun salacious stories, making her out to be some sort of “femme fatale” who would be capable of murdering her flat-mate, Meredith Kercher.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_Meredith_Kercher

Re:Naomi Wu video demonetized on YouTube by giantrobot on Thursday January 27, 2022 @08:47AM (#30100481)
At least you didn't use your old [email protected] address, you'd break the prude sensors.

/s for anyone wondering, I can only hope someone is still using some dumb Lycos e-mail today.

Re:Naomi Wu video demonetized on YouTube by prawn on Thursday January 27, 2022 @08:05AM (#30100041)
Quoting her: "I look the way I do for myself, and I don't object to any one else's polite enjoyment of that."

Considering something like body dysmorphia (as an example) might help give someone benefit of doubt. I'm not going to pretend to understand exactly why someone feels that way.

Re:Naomi Wu video demonetized on YouTube by SexyCyborg on Thursday January 27, 2022 @08:19AM (#30100184)
>Considering something like body dysmorphia (as an example) might help give someone benefit of doubt. I'm not going to pretend to understand exactly why someone feels that way.

Yes, it is something like that. But it's bullshit for me to dance around it and expect some sort of grace. I will say something.

Re:Naomi Wu video demonetized on YouTube by kragen on Thursday January 27, 2022 @08:39AM (#30100389)
I don't think you owe justifications for your body modifications or wardrobe to anybody: not to the police, not to the CPC, not to your parents, not to Google, and certainly not to random people on Twitter competing to see who can be the cruelest.