Re:Argv silliness – pkexec vuln (2013)
by RealityWinner on Wednesday January 26, 2022 @08:53PM
(#30095111)
Yes I understand I only made this recently. I've read for a while and wanted the ability to vote and comment so I made it. I updated my github[1] to prove ownership as well and put it in my about. If there are any issues brought up to me by other users about my name I would be open to renaming but at this time I would much prefer to use the username i've been using.
Ok, we can leave it like this for now, but if people end up reacting in the way I described, we're going to end up enforcing the policy. I've learned that it's much better to deal with these things earlier than later, but this is a borderline case so we can kick the can down the road.
Re:Argv silliness – pkexec vuln (2013)
by RealityWinner on Wednesday January 26, 2022 @09:20PM
(#30095343)
Thanks, I understand. In the meantime can you point me to where the policy is? I don't see it in the Guidelines[1].
There are zillions of moderation practices like that one. They all appear repeatedly in my moderation comments, often with search links that point to past examples. But we don't make a formal list, for a bunch of reasons. One is that it would make the guidelines so long that no one would read them. Another is that we're not bureaucrats. A third is that if you make a list of everything, people will conclude that if something is not on the list, it must be ok, and that's not at all how HN works. It has always been a spirit-of-the-law, not a letter-of-the-law place.
Re:Argv silliness – pkexec vuln (2013)
by RealityWinner on Wednesday January 26, 2022 @09:54PM
(#30095623)
Merely wanted to familiarize myself with any rules that I was not aware of. Cheers.
The problem is that some people are going to react as if the name is trolling, whether it is or not (https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&sor...). Since the account is only a couple weeks old, I feel like we should just rename it to avoid woe. It's not the worst case, of course.