The other end is questionable too. IMO, Gemini has too many features to be the 'low-fi chiptune' of hypertext. Every time I look at it, I come away thinking it is not in any sweet spot but perhaps the worst of both worlds: too featureful to truly foster creativity by constraint, and yet lacking entirely too many features to compete with a simple robust Markdown static site stack.
If we wanted the pixel art or low-fi chiptune of hypertext, both historically and in terms of esthetic, we'd be targeting classic textfiles: 80-col ASCII art .txt (maaaybe with the absolute bare minimum of adding a clickable link for navigation to make up for the lack of a TUI BBS interface wrapping the individual text files).
That’s pretty much gopher already.
Re:Gemini is a little gem
by errcorrectcode on Wednesday January 26, 2022 @08:34PM
(#30094927)
The web used to be jazzier with blink tags, Comic Sans, red-on-blue H1, and giant spew walls of yellow text lacking subpages.
Re:Gemini is a little gem
by boring_twenties on Wednesday January 26, 2022 @02:32PM
(#30090517)
Noisecore might be a better comparison.
Likening the web to orchestral music is questionable.