News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Two weeks later David Bennett is alive, his pig’s heart b... by dnautics on Wednesday January 26, 2022 @09:05AM (#30085493)
There are a wide range of options between startup bros and government. For example, in the US, a lot of electrical component standards and testing are managed by the UL, which is a nonprofit ngo.

Maybe something like "a UL for drug approval" might be worth a go.

Re:Two weeks later David Bennett is alive, his pig’s heart b... by InitialLastName on Wednesday January 26, 2022 @10:26AM (#30086612)
The market for counterfeit and unregulated chargers and electronics on Amazon/Alibaba (most all of which are UL marked) and fires related to the above suggests that the UL doesn't really have any teeth.

It's possible that medical approvals would be less prone to this sidestepping of independent regulators, since much of the spending is proxied by insurance companies looking to maximize profits and minimize BS spending, but I have very little confidence that such a system would function.

Re:Two weeks later David Bennett is alive, his pig’s heart b... by dnautics on Wednesday January 26, 2022 @10:44AM (#30086860)
There's also a wide range of things between the UL and FDA.

Besides, if it's counterfeit, then it's not actually UL marked, so I'm not sure what your argument is.

Re:Two weeks later David Bennett is alive, his pig’s heart b... by InitialLastName on Wednesday January 26, 2022 @11:23AM (#30087462)
> Besides, if it's counterfeit, then it's not actually UL marked, so I'm not sure what your argument is.

Consumers can't tell the difference between devices that are fraudulently or legitimately marked with the UL logo, and the UL doesn't appear to be able to do anything about the prevalence of fraudulent uses of the UL mark.