News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Two weeks later David Bennett is alive, his pig’s heart b... by inglor_cz on Wednesday January 26, 2022 @01:40AM (#30082519)
Well, the Zeitgeist of the social networks is "destroy the sinner mercilessly and crush him into dust" plus "whoever does not take part in that crushing or even advocates for mercy is suspicious himself". And too many journalists are on their social network accounts every waking hour, so it seeps through.

I suspect that quite a lot of people would support denial of medical care to sinners. For example, the sentiment of "triage against the unvaxxed" seems to be pretty strong.

(For the record, I am fully vaxed but do not support mistreatment of people who believe in conspiracy theories.)

Re:Two weeks later David Bennett is alive, his pig’s heart b... by bertil on Wednesday January 26, 2022 @02:26AM (#30082779)
What you see on social networks is a reflection of who you choose to follow and engage with. I use social networks to engage with people who actually make those decisions and they do not encourage any of that.
Re:Two weeks later David Bennett is alive, his pig’s heart b... by inglor_cz on Wednesday January 26, 2022 @03:07AM (#30083017)
Well, we are talking about journalists ("blue dots"), and their choices are their matter ...

https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2019/04/twitt...

Re:Two weeks later David Bennett is alive, his pig’s heart b... by bertil on Wednesday January 26, 2022 @05:30AM (#30083825)
Denying medical care is made either by individual health care professsionals or, in cases that require more consideration, health services ethics commity. I’d be surprised is anyone stating what you said would keep their medical license, let alone would be allowed to sit in a commitee.