Re:Economists are revising their views on robots and jobs
by bryanlarsen on Tuesday January 25, 2022 @07:23PM
(#30080080)
> one guy can sit in an air-conditioned combine harvester cab for a few hours listening to tunes,
I hope he's not listening to tunes. A change in the sound it's making is often the first warning that your $500,000 piece of machinery is about to self destruct.
Re:Economists are revising their views on robots and jobs
by worik on Tuesday January 25, 2022 @08:22PM
(#30080468)
> A change in the sound it's making is often the first warning that your $500,000 piece of machinery is about to self destruct.
Whose machine?
Re:Economists are revising their views on robots and jobs
by Supermancho on Tuesday January 25, 2022 @08:12PM
(#30080388)
I see it all the time, from combines to snowplows.
Re:Economists are revising their views on robots and jobs
by throwaway0a5e on Tuesday January 25, 2022 @08:55PM
(#30080678)
Anything that's got risk of becoming expensive will give you tactile or olfactory feedback.
Re:Economists are revising their views on robots and jobs
by dkjaudyeqooe on Wednesday January 26, 2022 @12:30AM
(#30082125)
More likely some warning light will illuminate on the dash first.
On the other hand, turns out that once a shirt is cheap humans will buy not just one extra so there's one to wear and one to wash, but a dozen, or hundreds. And they'll throw it away when it's a little worn not when it falls apart. So while industrialisation of fabric and clothing production made clothes cheap, the result wasn't that fewer people were employed in that work but that we just all bought more clothes.