Watson, like the AI craze in general, was mostly buzzwords and hype covering the fact that it was actually three application specialists in a trench coat trying to pass themselves off as machine intelligence.
I'm kind of surprised more companies didn't try follow suit, it would have been very easy to create the public impression that e.g. AlphaGo and AlphaFold were actually the same AI and available on GCP, or something like that. But I guess the deception breaks down faster when you're not hiring consultants.
Filtering out useful molecules from useless (or dangerous) ones is a nicely contained (if difficult) problem that ML is pretty good at solving.
When I think about IBM I think about a business company.
Google already added alpha fold into its gcp ai vertex service.
They make stuff very very end user-friendly and have been doing this with ai for a while.
The IBM health news was very disappointing to me and I would love to have more insight on it.
Until I have I will just believe that IBM is just not tech savvy enough or was to early technology wise.
Gcp also provides audit save and Industrie standards and complaince standards.
They go so far that they have contracts with pentagon and co. They also have the cooperation with the (or one of the biggest) healthcare providers in the USA tx to there complaince support on gcp.
After all GCP provides encryption on rest, in memory, with Google provided keys and customer provided keys.
They also have gvisor.
With the push of big companies like sap into the cloud, gcp aligns already to business companies globally.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30046432 IBM’s Watson Health is sold off in parts