Once hospitalizations are in decline most of the population will have been exposed.
It's not that simple. It's not a matter of doing something good vs not doing it, that's what an oversimplified black and white thinking is. It's about priorities, and about looking at certain types of damage compared to other types of damage, and choosing the best path that causes the least overall damage.
The case peak from omicron was 7x the delta numbers, hospitalization numbers were 2x, and icu was actually down.
I feel like omicron has burned through here, and there’s not a huge risk to opening at this point.
At the point when we have another infectious strain going around, they’re going to have to reevaluate, but that’s later.
I dont think all or even most of people who use those is truly confused and dont understand. Instead, allowing anything else then "if not 100% miracle it dont work" would force them to admit they are wrong or politicians they root for are wront.
It is much easier to beat the other side in argument if you pretend you are too simple to understand percentages and shades. Because contemporary culture treats nuance as weakness and pretty much accepts that kind of argument.
If anything, attacking anything that hints of "maybe we should reassess given current data" as being the same as the antimask/antivax rhetoric of the last two years is itself exactly what you are criticising.
It's a pity, but no, it's not the same as antimask/antivax rhetoric.
Pretending that all those people don't understand does not help anything. Which is why I made that point.
It is repeated patten from the start of pandemic. If something is not 100% perfect, there is not point on doing it and anyone doing it is stupid sheep. No matter how full hospitals are, you are stupid sheep for doing small things that take chances down (like getting vaccine). Pretending that massive powerful media machine broadcasting these are just confused serves no one.
The same applies to people who assume that unvaccinated people must be idiots.
Which doesn’t mean we all have to get it at the same time.
I’m so tired of these false dichotomies. There’s a lot of middle ground between full lockdown and completely giving up so everyone gets it at the same time. We’re already running out of ICU beds and emergency treatments like monoclonal antibodies where I’m at.
Yet the prevailing logic seems to be that because masks and distancing aren’t perfectly effective that we should just give up and go full-on into infections for everybody.