Starlink satellites hindering detection of near-Earth asteroids, study finds

Re:Starlink satellites hindering detection of near-Earth ast... by shaklee3 on Saturday January 22, 2022 @12:48AM (#30034024)

anecdotes don't really prove anything. while you can pay $100/mo, most people in rural America can't, and that's who they need for the most underserved users.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Starlink satellites hindering detection of near-Earth ast... by shagie on Saturday January 22, 2022 @09:43AM (#30037035)

My point is that they're already paying $50/month for 6Mbps DSL if they have any network connection at all.

Paying $100/month instead for 100Mbps satellite link is $50/month increase in cost and a 12x increase in performance.

The anecdote that I'm addressing isn't the children on a 70,000 acre vacation ranch (that likely can afford $100/month) but rather rural America.

Yes, ISPs and telecommunications needs to improve the network resources when you get more than 20 miles away from a city and suburbia. It will likely cost in the range of $100/month to get that when it is available.

Starlink meets that need now.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Starlink satellites hindering detection of near-Earth ast... by shaklee3 on Saturday January 22, 2022 @10:23AM (#30037442)

that's my point, though. they're nowhere near capacity and you're comparing it to solutions that are at capacity (DSL). just wait until they need to make more money and the system is capacity constrained.

[ Parent | on HN ]