News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Porting USB applications to the web. Part 1: libusb. Parent comment

Re:Porting USB applications to the web. Part 1: libusb by malepoon on Thursday January 20, 2022 @05:00PM (#30015735)
It's too bad these Chromium "specs" tend to be pretty low quality and rushed. They're then never changed because "too bad, we shipped it already, can't break the web!" See the garbage they tried to push in the form of NaCl, WebSQL, etc.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Porting USB applications to the web. Part 1: libusb by baxuz on Friday January 21, 2022 @08:51AM (#30023424)
Don't forget Web components v1
[ Parent | on HN ]