Re:Google is wrong. Apple’s iMessage is a failure
by parineum on Thursday January 20, 2022 @03:38AM
(#30006356)
The Pixel line is the first Google flagship. Nexus phones were budget vanilla android phones.
Re:Google is wrong. Apple’s iMessage is a failure
by llampx on Thursday January 20, 2022 @04:47AM
(#30006801)
The definition of flagship is specious at best. Recent Pixels have been coming out with budget mid-range processors and less technological prowess as compared to their brethren from Samsung etc, and the camera is at a standstill since the Pixel 2.
On the other hand, devices like the Nexus 4 had a big emphasis on powerful CPU and midrange price. Safe to say that Google's strategy is fluid, to put it charitably.
Re:Google is wrong. Apple’s iMessage is a failure
by mgkimsal on Thursday January 20, 2022 @05:48AM
(#30007219)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_Nexus
"Devices in the Nexus line were considered Google's flagship Android product"
Re:Google is wrong. Apple’s iMessage is a failure
by Dah00n on Thursday January 20, 2022 @06:01AM
(#30007316)
That is like saying the 601 limousine was Trabant's flagship product. Sure, yes, you are technically correct but... no. The Nexus devices were less than half the price of actual flagship products.
Re:Google is wrong. Apple’s iMessage is a failure
by llampx on Thursday January 20, 2022 @09:17AM
(#30009186)
Back when the Nexus came out, the top iPhones were selling for $599, if I recall correctly. So at $400 it was more than half, but that's splitting hairs because it was Google's flagship. By sales volume a bit player, but it occupied tremendous mindshare because of the brand.
Re:Google is wrong. Apple’s iMessage is a failure
by mgkimsal on Thursday January 20, 2022 @09:22AM
(#30009236)
I paid $400 (or more?) for what was billed from google as their premier nexus device (I just got whatever the lowest RAM was). I got it for a testing device. What was lauded was "doesn't come with carrier bloatware/apps". OK. Fine. It was a middling experience at best, but was presented as Google's 'best' at that time.
All that said, if you want value for money, you embrace the disposable nature of Android devices, and buy around the $200 mark. They may not consistently last much more than a year, but $/year on phones is much less. If you can get upstart flagship phones when they've crashed down to earth, even better: Fire, Robin, Essential was a nice period of commercial flops that made decent phones (baring that power state issue). And Mr. Rubin is rumored to be working on a new upstart phone, so maybe another good buy is coming up soon. (Hopefully with a headphone jack this time)