Re:How non-competes are damaging the Massachusetts economy: ...
by dhimes on Thursday September 15, 2011 @11:10AM
(#3000649)
A non-compete should be accompanied by a commensurate severance package in order to be taken seriously by a prospective employee.
Re:How non-competes are damaging the Massachusetts economy: ...
by nvarsj on Thursday September 15, 2011 @11:17AM
(#3000679)
Agreed. In the finance industry this is the norm in my experience - 100% salary for duration of the non-compete and a severance package.
Re:How non-competes are damaging the Massachusetts economy: ...
by mattm on Thursday September 15, 2011 @06:39PM
(#3002409)
Also agreed. If an employer is hindering you from working for X amount of time, they should be paying you for that time.
Re:How non-competes are damaging the Massachusetts economy: ...
by jamesbkel on Thursday September 15, 2011 @06:13PM
(#3002343)
Completely agree.
I was in a very similar to the woman in the article. I started at a Boston Medical/Life-science research LLC as a statistical programmer. The intention was to bring me on as the head of stats/quant work since they had been farming it for the past few years. After 2 months they decided they didn't actually have enough work to justify paying me (can't blame them for that, it reached a point where I literally was walking up to fellow employees asking if there was anything I could do to pitch in since I had NOTHING to do and I also don't consider "killing time on facebook/youtube etc." acceptable when I'm on their dollar).
Point being, I did not sign their boilerplate non-compete. They were actually fine with that as long I signed a confidentiality agreement... and that's only fair.
A non-compete is professional suicide, in my opinion. There is no upside to the employee at all.