Re:Google buys 1,000 patents from IBM to defend Android
by mhd on Wednesday September 14, 2011 @08:57PM
(#2998466)
Exactly 1023 patents? Does Google do those jokes even in a legal context? (Maybe someone had to count them using only his fingers)
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Google buys 1,000 patents from IBM to defend Android
by sgentle on Wednesday September 14, 2011 @10:09PM
(#2998632)
Honestly, good on them. This mobile patent crap is so ludicrous and out of hand. I'm glad that even though Google has to play by the same stupid rules as everyone else, at least they get the chance to remind everyone "you know this is a big joke right?" on occasion.
Christ, imagine how many jobs all of these patent cold war billions represent. Imagine how much time and energy is going into feeding a machine whose main outcome is stifling creativity and competition.
Re:Google buys 1,000 patents from IBM to defend Android
by daniel-cussen on Wednesday September 14, 2011 @09:58PM
(#2998611)
A lot of the time businesses don't know how to optimize certain things, and frequently prefer to choose big, round numbers. The only difference between them and Google is that regular businesses choose numbers that are simple to express in the decimal system and Google chooses numbers that are low-complexity in other ways, like the the square root of two or 1024.
Re:Google buys 1,000 patents from IBM to defend Android
by vvnraman on Wednesday September 14, 2011 @09:15PM
(#2998508)
1023 = 2^10 - 1.
It would have taken all the 10 fingers.
Re:Google buys 1,000 patents from IBM to defend Android
by notatoad on Wednesday September 14, 2011 @09:55PM
(#2998600)
1023=2^10, 0-indexed.
Re:Google buys 1,000 patents from IBM to defend Android
by gregable on Wednesday September 14, 2011 @11:30PM
(#2998796)
Even 0 indexed, 2^10 patents is still 1024 patents.
Re:Google buys 1,000 patents from IBM to defend Android
by angus77 on Thursday September 15, 2011 @12:46AM
(#2998945)
You missed their secret weapon, the zeroth patent.