Re:The curious case of the Raspberry Pi in the network close...
by smcl on Monday January 17, 2022 @08:08AM
(#29966151)
An ex-employee who still had a key to the office so they could move some stuff they had there. Presumably that courtesy was immediately terminated and the key was returned.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The curious case of the Raspberry Pi in the network close...
by anonymousiam on Monday January 17, 2022 @02:50PM
(#29970944)
Having a key to the office and having a key to the network closet are not the same thing. The article said only four people had access to the network closet. So did this guy break into the closet to plant the pi?
I think he got off way to easy.
Re:The curious case of the Raspberry Pi in the network close...
by smcl on Tuesday January 18, 2022 @04:59AM
(#29977093)
You'd have to ask the person who wrote the story. It's possible they said "a key" and meant "a set of keys" or something. Either way you're right the person who planted the RPi was quite lucky to get away with only a stern talking to.
Re:The curious case of the Raspberry Pi in the network close...
by Chris2048 on Monday January 17, 2022 @08:38AM
(#29966415)
oooh, I didn't realise they still had the key at that point. OK, I wouldn't have even said that - I'd have asked for the key back and boxed the remaining stuff myself. TBH, I'm surprised to what extend the employee would of had a bunch of stuff there - did they have furniture there or something?!
Re:The curious case of the Raspberry Pi in the network close...
by smcl on Monday January 17, 2022 @09:03AM
(#29966615)
Yeah it sounds like the person was on good terms with the company and was trusted enough, must have stung for whoever made the decision to trust the ex-employee to be sorta betrayed like that. The blog author is somewhere in the comments here, I don't know if they're willing to share much more info but let's see what they say.
Re:The curious case of the Raspberry Pi in the network close...
by Chris2048 on Monday January 17, 2022 @09:24AM
(#29966800)
So the article mentions:
> It was registered (or first deployed or set up?) on May 13th 2018
and the post itself is dated 2019-01-16
Since it says:
> he could still have a key for a few months
I assumed that by then the employee had given back the key, but I guess I was making a few assumptions about when this happened, and when the device had been installed - they don't actually say what date the RADIUS logs revealed they had accessed the network.