Re:Union Pacific Addresses LA Cargo Thefts; Problem Requires...
by berberous on Monday January 17, 2022 @01:40AM
(#29963955)
Some of this is really just common sense. I believe the following:
- If murder were not prosecuted, or punished by only a day in jail, murder rates would increase. It would effectively be legal.
- Changing the sentence on murder from 10 years to life, however, would be unlikely to have any marginal deterrent effect.
Stated more generally, I think many sentences in this country are horrifically long, and dramatically shortening them would not increase crime. But if you decrease them to a level where they are de minimis compared to the benefit of the crime, or just not prosecuted at all, I don’t need a study to tell me crime will increase. It is human nature.
Re:Union Pacific Addresses LA Cargo Thefts; Problem Requires...
by efitz on Monday January 17, 2022 @10:19AM
(#29967374)
Exactly! Beyond a certain threshold, increasing punishment severity has diminishing returns (or negative, if you count the fiscal and societal costs of incarceration).
Re:Union Pacific Addresses LA Cargo Thefts; Problem Requires...
by tomlockwood on Monday January 17, 2022 @02:09AM
(#29964113)
I've heard incorrect folk wisdom parroted as if it were true, before, so I'll wait for the study.
Plenty of people claim they have a grasp on common sense, and many of them disagree.
Re:Union Pacific Addresses LA Cargo Thefts; Problem Requires...
by efitz on Monday January 17, 2022 @10:20AM
(#29967391)
Do you eat when you’re hungry and put on a raincoat outside when it’s raining, or do you wait for a study?
Re:Union Pacific Addresses LA Cargo Thefts; Problem Requires...
by tomlockwood on Monday January 17, 2022 @05:05PM
(#29972202)
Hilarious that you bought up "eating when hungry" as an example of common sense considering all the discussion about that recently. Folk wisdom loses, again :) I think I will wait for the study.
https://newsroom.unsw.edu.au/news/business-law/do-harsher-pu...