Re:Auto-Refreshing lists is a basic expectation in 2011
by ericHosick on Wednesday September 14, 2011 @02:08AM
(#2995088)
The idea that a page should not be refreshed manually to get the latest information should have been a defacto "Web 2.0" idea.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Auto-Refreshing lists is a basic expectation in 2011
by silon on Wednesday September 14, 2011 @03:13AM
(#2995219)
Along with browser page history. I really get annoyed if I reload while site/network has a problem and can't go back to previous version.
Re:Auto-Refreshing lists is a basic expectation in 2011
by wladimir on Wednesday September 14, 2011 @04:06AM
(#2995327)
Oh yes, indeed. Please implement it well or of not don't implement it at all. Nothing is as annoying as reading an article and having it snap back to the beginning, or suddenly staring at an error page.
Sure, for console-like applications like EC2 you cannot do without auto-update. However, on content sites that require longer attention to one piece of information, it is not necessary.
Re:Auto-Refreshing lists is a basic expectation in 2011
by prateekdayal on Wednesday September 14, 2011 @03:16AM
(#2995225)
Does this apply to a Gmail or EC2 console kinda usecase? Going back to a previous version is essentially pointless because the state of your inbox/instances has already changed and that page is stale.
Re:Auto-Refreshing lists is a basic expectation in 2011
by adelle on Wednesday September 14, 2011 @03:54AM
(#2995300)
Most things labelled "Web 2.0" should have been a defacto "Web" idea.
Re:Auto-Refreshing lists is a basic expectation in 2011
by tuukkah on Wednesday September 14, 2011 @06:51AM
(#2995674)
Not really. There were other hypertext systems at the time, but the early HTTP and HTML were clearly the minimum viable product that kicked off the progression towards what we have today.