Re:Nuclear startup Oklo gets thumbs-down from regulators
by lifeisstillgood on Friday January 14, 2022 @06:25PM
(#29941896)
I completely agree - but let's call it scientific research not startups.
Startups are about industrialising existing working processes. What we are missing here is the multiple different funded experiments that take the different combinations of salts, heat exchangers and so on and come up with "hey this one works best" - make these.
Funding these experiments through VC is just asking for bias and PR not empirical results.
In short, if the government was running 100+ experimental reactors, this press release would be "whoops, 99 to go" and not even create a stir. It's only because there is 100M at stake is anyone fighting back.
Re:Nuclear startup Oklo gets thumbs-down from regulators
by ScarletEmerald on Friday January 14, 2022 @06:17PM
(#29941833)
> from Apple to ... I can't think of a company name starting with Z
Zeppelin? :)
Re:Nuclear startup Oklo gets thumbs-down from regulators
by hodgesrm on Friday January 14, 2022 @06:35PM
(#29941961)
That's cool! Nice pictures and a couple good videos of the Zeppelin in flight. I was a bit disappointed not to see any ads for beer on the side of the Zeppelins. Seemed like a marketing miss.
Re:Nuclear startup Oklo gets thumbs-down from regulators
by chi_handshake on Friday January 14, 2022 @07:50PM
(#29942497)
Zbiotics! https://zbiotics.com/
Re:Nuclear startup Oklo gets thumbs-down from regulators
by mattkrause on Friday January 14, 2022 @06:46PM
(#29942049)
Zillow?
Re:Nuclear startup Oklo gets thumbs-down from regulators
by dmurray on Friday January 14, 2022 @07:41PM
(#29942429)
Zenefits?
Re:Nuclear startup Oklo gets thumbs-down from regulators
by quickthrower2 on Friday January 14, 2022 @06:43PM
(#29942026)
Zeit unfortunately is now Vercel
Cynicism is extremely easy. Every company looks dodgy from the outside and most of them are dodgy. Many such posts turn out to be correct. But that is because cynicism is misplaced - the point of these startups is that some of them will, despite looking dodgy, turn out to be keystones for trillions of dollars of industrial success.
The upside of a serious energy revolution completely outweighs any of these points raised. There needs to be a way for dodgy-looking startups to experiment without just getting a "nah, this year's work is a write off. Oh well lol" from regulators.