News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Intel and Nvidia just dunked on Apple’s M1 Max. Should yo... by kahrl on Friday January 14, 2022 @10:36AM (#29935736)
No. You shouldn't. This is clickbait. All their benchmarks are meaningless, as they're comparing native x86 using GPGPU to virtualized Rosetta using no GPU acceleration.
Re:Intel and Nvidia just dunked on Apple’s M1 Max. Should yo... by usbqk on Friday January 14, 2022 @11:08AM (#29936193)
People want to run x86 code.
Re:Intel and Nvidia just dunked on Apple’s M1 Max. Should yo... by Uehreka on Friday January 14, 2022 @12:05PM (#29937019)
Not me. I have assembly-olfactory synesthesia and x86 code smells like the bad parts of gasoline.

Kidding aside, unless you’re looking to play games, most apps have either ported to Apple Silicon, or have a Beta of their port that is releasing soon. I think the M1 Pro/Max release was the kick in the pants that companies/projects like Adobe, Unity, Unreal and Blender needed in order to go “OK yeah, professionals use these, time to get porting”.

(I know some of these betas preceded the release of these laptops, but for a few months before these laptops came out it was clear they were going to be nuts)

Re:Intel and Nvidia just dunked on Apple’s M1 Max. Should yo... by kahrl on Friday January 14, 2022 @01:47PM (#29938420)
That's fine. We absolutely need benchmarks comparing native x86 performance against virtualized performance thru Rosetta 2. A lot of code isn't getting re-compiled for arm anytime soon.

All I'm saying is this article is clickbait because it frames these comparisons in the dumbest way possible as if to say 1 processor is better than the other, with no explanation that these are not 1-to-1 comparisons. It is a complete lie by omission.

Re:Intel and Nvidia just dunked on Apple’s M1 Max. Should yo... by zepto on Monday January 17, 2022 @01:27PM (#29969855)
No they don’t. People want to run fast code. Rosetta is just a stopgap.