There's a lot of incentive. The problem is HR and employers have decided to turn a blind eye to it in favor of looking at the next quarter.
Why give someone a 10% raise because the market has spoken when you might be able to retain them with a 5% raise? Even if you hire new employees at a premium, some contingent of older employees will stick around just because switching jobs is a hassle. This sort of thing drives down quarterly costs which ultimately makes you look good to shareholders who can't see the internal destruction.
Re:Cost of Attrition
by alex_anglin on Friday January 14, 2022 @09:20AM
(#29934692)
Reducing attrition is a good incentive, especially these days. Whether it's enough is another question.
Re:Cost of Attrition
by MattGaiser on Friday January 14, 2022 @10:03AM
(#29935281)
Do companies care? Their solution seems to be to hire more recruiters.
Re:Cost of Attrition
by willcipriano on Friday January 14, 2022 @11:51AM
(#29936854)
My wife is a tech recruiter, my bread gets buttered on both sides. It's a really funny market.
I agree. I don't think that there's any incentive to do that, though.