DMV ‘revisiting’ its approach to regulating Tesla’s public self-driving test

Re:DMV ‘revisiting’ its approach to regulating Tesla’s publi... by bpodgursky on Wednesday January 12, 2022 @01:48AM (#29903170)

I don't think this is a good faith answer; feels more like "I don't have a good answer for why this is a problem, so I'm going to punt it onto you to convince me"

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:DMV ‘revisiting’ its approach to regulating Tesla’s publi... by mellavora on Wednesday January 12, 2022 @03:51AM (#29903932)

Disagree. It is a good faith answer which states standard practice for safety standards.

Burden of proof is on Tesla to show that FSD is safe, not on the DMV to prove that it isn't.

You are welcome to argue that this principle is in need of reform. People may or may not agree with you. The discussion might be interesting.

But like it or not, the underlying principle for an exception to an established safety principle is that the burden of proof is on Tesla.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:DMV ‘revisiting’ its approach to regulating Tesla’s publi... by Kbelicius on Wednesday January 12, 2022 @02:38AM (#29903478)

The only ones who have the hard data are Tesla and you are expecting somebody else to provide it. Are you serious?

[ Parent | on HN ]