I'm not sure how you want me to respond to what you stated since it has nothing to do with what I stated.

Long term data doesn't exist. There's no evidence the vaccines are safe long term. They also experienced greatly accelerated trial periods with data and time that would have been woefully insufficient for any other medical intervention. The data, results, and methodology for the trials is currently embroiled in scientific and ethical controversy.

To state they are "the most well tested vaccines ever" is blatant gaslighting. Widely distributed is not tested.

The request for the other poster to "actually respond to what you have written" is somewhat ironic given that you didn't do the same for them. They specifically said they wanted data on the "long term side effects" which you then completely ignored in your reply, and instead talked about how it had been "administered to a couple of billion people".

This is something that I see authoritarian pro-mandate people do all the time and it genuinely confuses me. Why do you do this? Do you think that testing with a billion people for a year will give you the same data as testing a hundred million people for ten years? Or is it just a genuine mistake?