Right…Vaccines we have been using for many years.

How do you propose to get to the point that a vaccine has been used for many years? They were new at some point.

Normally a vaccine trial lasts for 5+ years, and many vaccines do not survive the trial due to adverse effects.

You can not know longer-term effects before the 5 year trial has concluded, so approving after a short trial and then inevitably mandating is one of the most reckless large-scale experiments ever done.

The vaccine trials normally last that long because it's usually much harder to get so many deaths in the control group. It's not done with the intent to show safety.

Vaccine trials have historically been 5+ years because of the way the phases are scheduled and timed, not because long term effects present or are tracked for 5+ years.

They are breaking vaccine approval protocol that often discover sever side-effects that lead to the vaccines not being approved.

In addition to cutting down approval steps due to a shortened time frame as well as using a vaccine protocol to EUA a gene therapy based vaxx tech, they are also skipping the childhood science advisory panel after they said no the first time [1].

This is not how you do science.

[1]https://www.wsj.com/articles/dangerous-push-to-give-boosters...

Absolutely. It's a live experimental trial.

Which trials are non-experimental? Or non-live, for that matter?

Ah, right. I forgot to say that it was "a trial forced on the entire human populace." Better?

Vaccines with far fewer negative side effects.