Re:Milan confirms new cycling network linking 80% of the cit...
by kombine on Monday January 10, 2022 @09:45AM
(#29875532)
So what would you propose as a solution specifically for Oxford? Many streets such as Abingdon Rd are already narrow enough and I can't see how one could segregate a dedicated lane for cyclists there.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Milan confirms new cycling network linking 80% of the cit...
by Doctor_Fegg on Monday January 10, 2022 @09:51AM
(#29875633)
Abingdon Road is the difficult one because it genuinely isn't wide enough for segregated tracks. But it's also the easy one because there's a parallel, direct backstreet route (Marlborough Road/Wytham Street), and Abingdon Road itself has few enough businesses that it's not really a destination in itself.
The Quickways proposals are focused on East Oxford where there is enough space. Broadly speaking, all of the East Oxford arterials have enough space for a segregated track on at least one side, usually both. It's only the immediate vicinity of the Plain where they're very narrow. But you could get two protected tracks along the Cowley Road as far as Marsh Road, assuming you reworked the road furniture and parking spaces; one protected track along the Iffley Road from the Plain to somewhere round Magdalen Road, and two from there on; two along most of Headington/London Road, Marston Road, and so on.
Re:Milan confirms new cycling network linking 80% of the cit...
by xenocratus on Monday January 10, 2022 @09:54AM
(#29875711)
And that's why the national cycling network actively avoids Abingdon Rd: https://explore.osmaps.com/en/route/3647727/Sustrans-Hanson-...
Re:Milan confirms new cycling network linking 80% of the cit...
by orangepurple on Monday January 10, 2022 @11:08AM
(#29876940)
Remove all paint and signage to make car drivers slow down from fear. Require cyclists to have extremely bright flashing rear lights. If all else fails increase the number of tiny roundabouts and speed bumps.